Saturday, September 26, 2009

What Makes Me Stop Reading?

Like most librarians and writers, I love to read - novels, poetry, picture books, biographies. You name it. BUT, when it comes to critiquing somebody's manuscript, it's hard to read everything. Here are a few of my pet peeves in writing, sins that make me yawn or lose interest immediately and put a story down.

1. Stories that begin with a long, unpopulated description of a place. Unless you're writing a segment of The World Without Us, who cares? Put a living being in there, for god's sake, then perhaps I'll have a reason to keep reading.

2. Cliches. A work of fiction that begins with a character waking from a dream, starting at a new school, etc. or that opens with a cliche phrase, such as the infamous, "It was a dark and stormy night."

3. Too much backstory. I lack the patience to read through a lot of meandering background information. A little here and there is okay, but the opening chapter of a novel needs to pull the reader forward, not muddle around in the past. I want a story that begins with action and by that, I don't mean a violent or shocking scene that practically makes me wretch or one so bizarre I can only laugh, but one that makes me care enough about the characters that I want to read more.

4. Stock Characters. You know them -the jolly fat man or lady, the mad scientist, the wicked stepmother, the blond haired, blue-eyed hero or heroine, the world-weary reporter, etc. I don't want to read about the same old same old.

5. Too much description. Here's one sin I'm often guilty of. Sometimes the story gets buried under heaps of adjectives and adverbs and it's hard to know what's going on. The advice to use strong verbs instead of using adverbs to prop up your weak verb choices is a good one. And take it easy on the adjectives. Let the story speak for itself, when you can.

6. Poor grammar and punctuation. If you're not sure how something is spelled or punctuated, then look it up. Easy enough. A manuscript littered with errors is a big turn-off and no editor is going to wade through it to see if there's a story worth salvaging from the wreckage.

7. Talking heads. It's hard to follow a story when you don't know who's speaking. Use dialog tags (a simple "he said" is enough) or add another sentence that lets the reader know who's speaking.

8. Nothing happens. I've read lovely settings and been introduced to some interesting characters, but sometimes absolutely nothing happens in a first chapter, leaving me to wonder if it's a story at all. To keep me reading, you need to introduce a dilemma or conflict otherwise why bother?

These are a few of my biggest writing pet peeves. What are yours?

5 comments:

Mary Witzl said...

Characters who get along famously and have a lot of fun together with never a dispute or difference of opinion in sight.

I've been guilty of this myself, though. In reality, it's great to get along and do without angst. In writing, it's a real bore.

Robyn Russell said...

The best way to get me to put a book down is to fail to give depth to the characters, to make me feel like I know them and like them. If there's no one I feel like rooting for, what do I care what happens next?

Interesting point about the dialog tags, by the way. I think some authors have had it drilled into them that they're usually unnecessary and should be avoided, and so we end up with the occasional passage where the reader must guess who's talking.

Stella said...

Good point, Mary. Even best friends have an occasional spat or get underneath each other's skin. And thanks for that reminder.

And depth of character is so important, but so much harder to accomplish than it seems. Of course we all want to create characters that are believable as well as likable, in some way. The reader needs to be able to root for a character, or what's the point?

Thanks for stopping by, ladies. I apologize for being so slow to respond. The day job definitely gets in the way.

Rose Green said...

#3, 5, 6, and 8 drive me insane.

Additionally, books that set up a particular promise and then fail to deliver, and books that start with a crash-bang (murder, the world ending, some other horrifying event) without giving me the chance to care about the character.

Stella said...

I agree, Rose. Books that set up a promise but then fail to carry through on it are irksome - the kind I'll toss across the room. I also don't like novels that begin with a bang. I think it's a cheap stunt. Thanks for stopping in!